PhytophthoraV1, Main, Exploration, bibRecord, 000E11

PCR-based specific techniques used for detecting the most important pathogens on strawberry: a systematic review.

Identifieur interne : 000E11 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000E10; suivant : 000E12

PCR-based specific techniques used for detecting the most important pathogens on strawberry: a systematic review.

Auteurs : Seyed Mahyar Mirmajlessi [Estonie] ; Marialaura Destefanis ; Richard Alexander Gottsberger ; Marika M Nd ; Evelin Loit

Source :

Systematic reviews [ 2046-4053 ] ; 2015.

RBID : pubmed:25588564

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (MeSH), Fragaria (microbiology), Plant Diseases (microbiology), Plant Leaves (microbiology), Polymerase Chain Reaction (MeSH), Reproducibility of Results (MeSH), Sensitivity and Specificity (MeSH).
MESH :
- microbiology : Fragaria, Plant Diseases, Plant Leaves.
- Cost-Benefit Analysis, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Strawberry diseases are a major limiting factor that severely impact plant agronomic performance. Regarding limitations of traditional techniques for detection of pathogens, researchers have developed specific DNA-based tests as sensitive and specific techniques. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods used for detection or quantification of the most widespread strawberry pathogens, such as Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. fragariae, Phytophthora fragariae, Colletotrichum acutatum, Verticillium dahliae, Botrytis cinerea, Macrophomina phaseolina, and Xanthomonas fragariae. An updated and detailed list of published PCR protocols is presented and discussed, aimed at facilitating access to information that could be particularly useful for diagnostic laboratories in order to develop a rapid, cost-effective, and reliable monitoring technique.

METHODS

The study design was a systematic review of PCR-based techniques used for detection and quantification of strawberry pathogens. Using appropriate subject headings, AGRICOLA, AGRIS, BASE, Biological Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, and SpringerLink databases were searched from their inception up to April 2014. Two assessors independently reviewed the titles, abstracts, and full articles of all identified citations. Selected articles were included if one of the mentioned strawberry pathogens was investigated based on PCR methods, and a summary of pre-analytical requirements for PCR was provided.

RESULTS

A total of 259 titles and abstracts were reviewed, of which 22 full texts met all the inclusion criteria. Our systematic review identified ten different protocols for X. fragariae, eight for P. fragariae, four for B. cinerea, six for C. acutatum, three for V. dahlia, and only one for F. oxysporum. The accuracy and sensitivity of PCR diagnostic methods is the focus of most studies included in this review. However, a large proportion of errors in laboratories occur in the pre-analytical phase of the testing process. Due to heterogeneity, results could not be meta-analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

From a systematic review of the currently available published literature, effective detection assays to detect the major strawberry pathogens have been developed. These assays can function as a basis for clinical labs, regulatory personnel, and other diagnosticians to adapt or implement for detection of these six important strawberry pathogens.

DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-9
PubMed: 25588564
PubMed Central: PMC4320524

Affiliations:

Estonie

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream Main, to step Corpus: 000F04
to stream Main, to step Curation: 000F04

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">PCR-based specific techniques used for detecting the most important pathogens on strawberry: a systematic review.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Mirmajlessi, Seyed Mahyar" sort="Mirmajlessi, Seyed Mahyar" uniqKey="Mirmajlessi S" first="Seyed Mahyar" last="Mirmajlessi">Seyed Mahyar Mirmajlessi</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Field Crops and Grassland Husbandry, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia. m.mirmajlessi@gmail.com.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Estonie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Field Crops and Grassland Husbandry, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Tartu</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Destefanis, Marialaura" sort="Destefanis, Marialaura" uniqKey="Destefanis M" first="Marialaura" last="Destefanis">Marialaura Destefanis</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gottsberger, Richard Alexander" sort="Gottsberger, Richard Alexander" uniqKey="Gottsberger R" first="Richard Alexander" last="Gottsberger">Richard Alexander Gottsberger</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="M Nd, Marika" sort="M Nd, Marika" uniqKey="M Nd M" first="Marika" last="M Nd">Marika M Nd</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Loit, Evelin" sort="Loit, Evelin" uniqKey="Loit E" first="Evelin" last="Loit">Evelin Loit</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2015">2015</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:25588564</idno>
<idno type="pmid">25588564</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1186/2046-4053-4-9</idno>
<idno type="pmc">PMC4320524</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000F04</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000F04</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000F04</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000F04</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000F04</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">PCR-based specific techniques used for detecting the most important pathogens on strawberry: a systematic review.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Mirmajlessi, Seyed Mahyar" sort="Mirmajlessi, Seyed Mahyar" uniqKey="Mirmajlessi S" first="Seyed Mahyar" last="Mirmajlessi">Seyed Mahyar Mirmajlessi</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Field Crops and Grassland Husbandry, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia. m.mirmajlessi@gmail.com.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Estonie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Field Crops and Grassland Husbandry, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Tartu</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Destefanis, Marialaura" sort="Destefanis, Marialaura" uniqKey="Destefanis M" first="Marialaura" last="Destefanis">Marialaura Destefanis</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gottsberger, Richard Alexander" sort="Gottsberger, Richard Alexander" uniqKey="Gottsberger R" first="Richard Alexander" last="Gottsberger">Richard Alexander Gottsberger</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="M Nd, Marika" sort="M Nd, Marika" uniqKey="M Nd M" first="Marika" last="M Nd">Marika M Nd</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Loit, Evelin" sort="Loit, Evelin" uniqKey="Loit E" first="Evelin" last="Loit">Evelin Loit</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Systematic reviews</title>
<idno type="eISSN">2046-4053</idno>
<imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Cost-Benefit Analysis (MeSH)</term>
<term>Fragaria (microbiology)</term>
<term>Plant Diseases (microbiology)</term>
<term>Plant Leaves (microbiology)</term>
<term>Polymerase Chain Reaction (MeSH)</term>
<term>Reproducibility of Results (MeSH)</term>
<term>Sensitivity and Specificity (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse coût-bénéfice (MeSH)</term>
<term>Feuilles de plante (microbiologie)</term>
<term>Fragaria (microbiologie)</term>
<term>Maladies des plantes (microbiologie)</term>
<term>Reproductibilité des résultats (MeSH)</term>
<term>Réaction de polymérisation en chaîne (MeSH)</term>
<term>Sensibilité et spécificité (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Feuilles de plante</term>
<term>Fragaria</term>
<term>Maladies des plantes</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Fragaria</term>
<term>Plant Diseases</term>
<term>Plant Leaves</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Cost-Benefit Analysis</term>
<term>Polymerase Chain Reaction</term>
<term>Reproducibility of Results</term>
<term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse coût-bénéfice</term>
<term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term>
<term>Réaction de polymérisation en chaîne</term>
<term>Sensibilité et spécificité</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b>
</p>
<p>Strawberry diseases are a major limiting factor that severely impact plant agronomic performance. Regarding limitations of traditional techniques for detection of pathogens, researchers have developed specific DNA-based tests as sensitive and specific techniques. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods used for detection or quantification of the most widespread strawberry pathogens, such as Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. fragariae, Phytophthora fragariae, Colletotrichum acutatum, Verticillium dahliae, Botrytis cinerea, Macrophomina phaseolina, and Xanthomonas fragariae. An updated and detailed list of published PCR protocols is presented and discussed, aimed at facilitating access to information that could be particularly useful for diagnostic laboratories in order to develop a rapid, cost-effective, and reliable monitoring technique.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b>
</p>
<p>The study design was a systematic review of PCR-based techniques used for detection and quantification of strawberry pathogens. Using appropriate subject headings, AGRICOLA, AGRIS, BASE, Biological Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, and SpringerLink databases were searched from their inception up to April 2014. Two assessors independently reviewed the titles, abstracts, and full articles of all identified citations. Selected articles were included if one of the mentioned strawberry pathogens was investigated based on PCR methods, and a summary of pre-analytical requirements for PCR was provided.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b>
</p>
<p>A total of 259 titles and abstracts were reviewed, of which 22 full texts met all the inclusion criteria. Our systematic review identified ten different protocols for X. fragariae, eight for P. fragariae, four for B. cinerea, six for C. acutatum, three for V. dahlia, and only one for F. oxysporum. The accuracy and sensitivity of PCR diagnostic methods is the focus of most studies included in this review. However, a large proportion of errors in laboratories occur in the pre-analytical phase of the testing process. Due to heterogeneity, results could not be meta-analyzed.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>
</p>
<p>From a systematic review of the currently available published literature, effective detection assays to detect the major strawberry pathogens have been developed. These assays can function as a basis for clinical labs, regulatory personnel, and other diagnosticians to adapt or implement for detection of these six important strawberry pathogens.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25588564</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2018</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>02</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">2046-4053</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>4</Volume>
<PubDate><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>Jan</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Systematic reviews</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Syst Rev</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>PCR-based specific techniques used for detecting the most important pathogens on strawberry: a systematic review.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>9</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1186/2046-4053-4-9</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Strawberry diseases are a major limiting factor that severely impact plant agronomic performance. Regarding limitations of traditional techniques for detection of pathogens, researchers have developed specific DNA-based tests as sensitive and specific techniques. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods used for detection or quantification of the most widespread strawberry pathogens, such as Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. fragariae, Phytophthora fragariae, Colletotrichum acutatum, Verticillium dahliae, Botrytis cinerea, Macrophomina phaseolina, and Xanthomonas fragariae. An updated and detailed list of published PCR protocols is presented and discussed, aimed at facilitating access to information that could be particularly useful for diagnostic laboratories in order to develop a rapid, cost-effective, and reliable monitoring technique.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">The study design was a systematic review of PCR-based techniques used for detection and quantification of strawberry pathogens. Using appropriate subject headings, AGRICOLA, AGRIS, BASE, Biological Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, and SpringerLink databases were searched from their inception up to April 2014. Two assessors independently reviewed the titles, abstracts, and full articles of all identified citations. Selected articles were included if one of the mentioned strawberry pathogens was investigated based on PCR methods, and a summary of pre-analytical requirements for PCR was provided.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">A total of 259 titles and abstracts were reviewed, of which 22 full texts met all the inclusion criteria. Our systematic review identified ten different protocols for X. fragariae, eight for P. fragariae, four for B. cinerea, six for C. acutatum, three for V. dahlia, and only one for F. oxysporum. The accuracy and sensitivity of PCR diagnostic methods is the focus of most studies included in this review. However, a large proportion of errors in laboratories occur in the pre-analytical phase of the testing process. Due to heterogeneity, results could not be meta-analyzed.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">From a systematic review of the currently available published literature, effective detection assays to detect the major strawberry pathogens have been developed. These assays can function as a basis for clinical labs, regulatory personnel, and other diagnosticians to adapt or implement for detection of these six important strawberry pathogens.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mirmajlessi</LastName>
<ForeName>Seyed Mahyar</ForeName>
<Initials>SM</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Field Crops and Grassland Husbandry, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia. m.mirmajlessi@gmail.com.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Destefanis</LastName>
<ForeName>Marialaura</ForeName>
<Initials>M</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gottsberger</LastName>
<ForeName>Richard Alexander</ForeName>
<Initials>RA</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mänd</LastName>
<ForeName>Marika</ForeName>
<Initials>M</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Loit</LastName>
<ForeName>Evelin</ForeName>
<Initials>E</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D000078182">Systematic Review</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country>
<MedlineTA>Syst Rev</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101580575</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>2046-4053</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003362" MajorTopicYN="N">Cost-Benefit Analysis</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D031985" MajorTopicYN="N">Fragaria</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010935" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Diseases</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018515" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Leaves</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="Y">microbiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016133" MajorTopicYN="Y">Polymerase Chain Reaction</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012680" MajorTopicYN="N">Sensitivity and Specificity</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>08</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>02</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>29</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25588564</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">2046-4053-4-9</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1186/2046-4053-4-9</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4320524</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Mycologia. 2011 May-Jun;103(3):466-73</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21186328</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Fungal Biol. 2012 Oct;116(10):1073-80</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23063186</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):383-5</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11846607</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Microbiol Methods. 2004 Aug;58(2):281-4</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15234526</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nat Biotechnol. 1999 Aug;17(8):804-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10429248</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mol Cell Probes. 2003 Apr-Jun;17(2-3):69-75</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12788027</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Biotechniques. 1997 Jan;22(1):130-1, 134-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8994660</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Aug;20(8):1362-75</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12777515</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Nov 25;18(22):6531-5</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1979162</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Phytopathology. 2000 May;90(5):448-53</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18944548</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Microbiol Methods. 2005 Mar;60(3):315-23</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15649533</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2009;11(1):13-46</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18577779</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Phytopathology. 2008 Mar;98(3):359-68</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18944088</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Sep;62(9):3121-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8795198</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Anal Biochem. 1997 Feb 15;245(2):154-60</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9056205</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Crit Rev Microbiol. 2005;31(2):91-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15988839</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Plant Physiol Biochem. 2005 Sep;43(9):890-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16198585</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Stud Mycol. 2012 Sep 15;73(1):37-113</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23136458</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Biotechniques. 1998 Jun;24(6):954-8, 960, 962</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9631186</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2003;41:305-24</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14527331</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Curr Genet. 2000 May;37(5):339-47</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10853772</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Phytopathology. 2012 Mar;102(3):331-43</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22066673</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000 Jul;50 Pt 4:1463-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10939651</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Microbiol Methods. 2007 Aug;70(2):379-83</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17588695</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 May;9 Suppl s1:114-29</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21564971</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002 Apr 9;209(2):169-74</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12007801</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Phytopathology. 1999 Dec;89(12):1218-25</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18944648</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Phytopathology. 2006 Apr;96(4):336-45</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18943415</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1993;31:81-109</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18643762</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000 Oct;13(4):559-70</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11023957</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mycologia. 2007 Nov-Dec;99(6):797-803</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18333503</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Mol Gen Genet. 1995 Dec 20;249(6):637-47</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8544829</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Environ Microbiol. 2005 Nov;7(11):1698-710</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16232285</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Phytopathology. 2001 Feb;91(2):120-6</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18944384</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Pest Manag Sci. 2003 Feb;59(2):129-42</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12587866</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Food Prot. 2000 Mar;63(3):386-94</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10716570</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Estonie</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Destefanis, Marialaura" sort="Destefanis, Marialaura" uniqKey="Destefanis M" first="Marialaura" last="Destefanis">Marialaura Destefanis</name>
<name sortKey="Gottsberger, Richard Alexander" sort="Gottsberger, Richard Alexander" uniqKey="Gottsberger R" first="Richard Alexander" last="Gottsberger">Richard Alexander Gottsberger</name>
<name sortKey="Loit, Evelin" sort="Loit, Evelin" uniqKey="Loit E" first="Evelin" last="Loit">Evelin Loit</name>
<name sortKey="M Nd, Marika" sort="M Nd, Marika" uniqKey="M Nd M" first="Marika" last="M Nd">Marika M Nd</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="Estonie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Mirmajlessi, Seyed Mahyar" sort="Mirmajlessi, Seyed Mahyar" uniqKey="Mirmajlessi S" first="Seyed Mahyar" last="Mirmajlessi">Seyed Mahyar Mirmajlessi</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PhytophthoraV1/Data/Main/Exploration

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E11 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000E11 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Bois
   |area=    PhytophthoraV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:25588564
   |texte=   PCR-based specific techniques used for detecting the most important pathogens on strawberry: a systematic review.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:25588564" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PhytophthoraV1

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38.
Data generation: Fri Nov 20 11:20:57 2020. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 16:48:20 2024

	Serveur d'exploration Phytophthora
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration Phytophthora

PCR-based specific techniques used for detecting the most important pathogens on strawberry: a systematic review.

PCR-based specific techniques used for detecting the most important pathogens on strawberry: a systematic review.

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

Pour générer des pages wiki